Guideline 1.1 – Children under the age of 10 years and children aged 10 years or more whom the court determines are not mature enough to give instructions
(a) Guideline guid ance notes
For Victoria Legal Aid (VLA) to fund legal assistance under guideline 1.1:
- the child must be under 10 years and the court must have made an order under s. 524(4) of the Act (ie that it is in the child's best interests to be legally represented), or
- the child must be 10 years or more and the court must have made orders under both s. 524(1B) of the Act (ie that they are not mature enough to give instructions) and s. 524(4) of the Act (ie that it is in the child's best interests to be legally represented), and
- the court must have referred the matter to VLA, and
- VLA must consider that it is appropriate to fund legal assistance.
(b) Other eligibility c riteria
VLA does not apply the means test to, and does not require a financial contribution from, a child or their spouse or de facto partner (if applicable).
VLA will assess whether the State reasonableness test is satisfied. Generally this test will be assessed as satisfied where a s. 524(4) order has been made.
(c) Grants assessment process
Lawyers do not apply for a grant of assistance under guideline 1.1. Where a s. 524(4) order has been made and the Children's Court (Family Division) requests VLA to arrange legal representation for the child, VLA will allocate the initial broadband grant of legal assistance to a lawyer on the s. 29A Children's Court panel.
(d) Documentary requirements
After a ‘best interests’ lawyer is allocated to work on a matter funded under guideline 1.1, the lawyer's file should include:
- a copy of the s. 524(4) order and s. 524(1B) order (if applicable) – which VLA will provide to the allocated lawyer
- the basis on which they believe actions to be in the best interests of the child
- all other relevant notes, supporting evidence and documents as identified in the documentary requirements section.
Lawyers are also encouraged to complete a Child Protection worksheet for child applicants if applying for any extensions to the initial broadband grant.
Guideline 1.2 – Children aged 10 years and older
(a) Guideline notes
VLA may grant legal assistance to a child in the Children's Court (Family Division), provided the child is sufficiently mature to give instructions to a lawyer. VLA will generally consider a child aged 10 years or older to be mature enough to give instructions.
Exceptions include:
- where a judicial officer determines that a child aged 10 years or more is not mature enough to give instructions under s. 524(1B) of the Act – then guideline 1.1 will apply
- where a young person under 18 years is involved in a Children’s Court (Family Division) case in their capacity as a parent – then guideline 2.1 will apply.
(b) Other eligibility criteria
The VLA means test does not apply to a child or any spouse or de facto partner (if applicable).
The State reasonableness test needs to be satisfied. Where a child applicant:
- is not initiating a proceeding – this test should be assessed as satisfied, or
- is initiating a proceeding – then an assessment must be made as to whether the test is met (including the cost/benefit and merit criteria of this test).
(c) Grants assessment process
Lawyers can lodge an application for a broadband grant of legal assistance under guideline 1.2 via the ATLAS simplified grants ‘new application’ template (under ‘Costs & Disbursements’ select the ‘Initial Lump Sum Fee’ option).
(d) Documentary requirements
The lawyer's file should include:
- a reference to guideline 1.2
- the lawyer's assessment of the child's capacity to give instructions, if required
i) a case strategy plan; AND
ii) all other relevant notes, supporting evidence and documents as identified in the documentary requirements section.
Lawyers are also encouraged to complete a Child Protection matter worksheet for child applicants.
Interim stage extensions
(a) IAO Mention and adjournment (other than contested hearings)
The extent of legal assistance available under a broadband grant under guideline 1 is discussed in Notes on fees and other costs payable in child protection matters.
It includes fees for, among other things, four mentions and four adjournments (but mentions/adjournments where a costs order is made in favour of the client are not counted in this limit).
Lawyers can make an application for extensions for additional mentions and/or adjournments during the interim stage using the ATLAS ‘extension’ template (under ‘Costs & Disbursements’).
Unlike adult applicants, the grounds for extension where an applicant is a child are not limited (and do not require extraordinary circumstances or interim breach proceedings). However, where more than three mention/adjournment extensions are applied for, then the lawyer should attach correspondence explaining why the proceedings have been protracted and further extensions are required.
(b) Readiness hearings and judicial resolution conferences
An extension application is to be submitted via the ATLAS simplified grant 'extension' template.
This extension includes fees for one readiness hearing or judicial resolution conference, one post-readiness hearing mention and one directions hearing.
As previously noted, where a child applicant is not initiating proceedings, the State reasonableness test should be assessed as satisfied.
(c) Interim and final contested hearings
With hearings of more than ten days being VLA assessed and requiring a completed worksheet and copies of relevant reports to be provided, where a child is to be represented in:
- interim contest by evidence – an extension application is to be submitted via the ATLAS simplified grants ‘extension’ template. The lawyer will need to apply for:
- the first ten days of hearing – which can be recommended by the lawyer, and
- if the hearing will exceed ten days – the lawyer will also need to apply for the additional hearing days. The application will be VLA assessed and the lawyer will be required to lodge with the application:
- a completed worksheet for hearing funding exceeding ten days
- all relevant reports as identified in the worksheet.
Note: Where the lawyer claims an uplift fee for an IAO contest by submissions, the lawyer must apply retrospectively as for a non-standard disbursement as described in Notes on fees and other costs payable.
- a final contested hearing – an extension application is to be submitted via the ATLAS simplified grant ‘extension’ template. The lawyer will need to apply for:
- the first ten days of hearing – which can be recommended by the lawyer, and
- if the hearing will exceed ten days – the lawyer will also need to apply for the additional hearing days. The application will be VLA assessed and the lawyer will be required to lodge with the application:
- a completed worksheet for hearing funding exceeding ten days
- all relevant reports as identified in the worksheet.
If it is known before the final contested hearing that the hearing will take more than ten days, the lawyer should apply for the additional hearing days as early as possible prior to the hearing date. If the final contested hearing unexpectedly exceeds ten days, then the lawyer should lodge a further extension application as soon as it becomes apparent that the initial ten day grant will not be sufficient.
As previously noted, where a child applicant is not initiating proceedings, the State reasonableness test should be assessed as satisfied.
Updated